Why the study?
Does local bone mineral density correlate with the pullout strength of suture anchors in glenoid labral reattachment?
Does local bone mineral density correlate with the pullout strength of suture anchors in glenoid labral reattachment?
Local bone mineral density significantly correlates with suture anchor pullout strength, suggesting bone quality may indicate the relative risk of failure following glenoid labral repairs.
Bone density may influence anchor stability in labral repairs; animal data leaves open human translation and practice change.
Background The use of suture anchors in glenoid labral reattachment is now routine in many shoulder procedures. However, debate still surrounds the biomechanical characteristics of suture anchors and the interplay with bone quality. Methods Eight embalmed cadaveric glenoids were investigated using a microCT and a tensile testing machine to study the correlation between the bone mineral density of four different regions on the glenoid rim and the pullout strength of the suture anchor. Six constructs failed by suture breakage whilst the remaining 25 positions suffered suture pullout. This study differed from previous investigations by using Orthocord, a much stronger suture material permitting better evaluation of bone properties. Results The mean failure load at pullout and suture compromise was 125 ± 40 N and 189 ± 25 N, respectively. The largest value of bone mineral density (BMD) was found at the posterior suture site, whilst the lowest occurred at the inferior edge of the anterior margin. For those constructs that failed by anchor pullout a significant correlation was observed between failure load and local bone mineral density (r Pearson = 0.56, p = 0.004). Conclusion This relationship between local bone quality and pullout strength maybe a clinical indicator of the relative risk of failure following the suture repairs and warrants further exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mimar et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: