Theoretical analysis establishes cheating probability tradeoffs in quantum oblivious transfer, demonstrating fundamental security limits in quantum cryptography.
Oblivious transfer is a fundamental cryptographic primitive in which Bob transfers one of two bits to Alice in such a way that Bob cannot know which of the two bits Alice has learned. We present an optimal security bound for quantum oblivious transfer protocols, in the information theoretic setting, under a natural and arguably demanding definition of what it means for Alice to cheat. Our lower bound is a smooth tradeoff between the probability P Bob with which Bob can guess Alice's bit choice and the probability P Alice with which Alice can guess both of Bob's bits given that she learns one of the bits with certainty. We prove that 2P Bob + P Alice 2 in any quantum protocol for oblivious transfer, from which it follows that one of the two parties must be able to cheat with probability at least 2/3. We prove that this bound is optimal by exhibiting a family of protocols whose cheating probabilities can be made arbitrarily close to any point on the tradeoff curve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chailloux et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: