Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Na–O 2 system holds great potential as a low-cost, high-energy-density battery, but under normal operating conditions, the discharge is limited to sodium superoxide (NaO 2 ), whereas the high-capacity peroxide state (Na 2 O 2 ) remains elusive. Here, we apply density functional theory calculations with an improved error-correction scheme to determine equilibrium potentials and free energies as a function of temperature for the different phases of NaO 2 and Na 2 O 2, identifying NaO 2 as the thermodynamically preferred discharge product up to ∼120 K, after which Na 2 O 2 is thermodynamically preferred. We also investigate the reaction mechanisms and resulting electrochemical overpotentials on stepped surfaces of the NaO 2 and Na 2 O 2 systems, showing low overpotentials for NaO 2 formation (η dis = 0.14 V) and depletion (η cha = 0.19 V), whereas the overpotentials for Na 2 O 2 formation (η dis = 0.69 V) and depletion (η cha = 0.68 V) are found to be prohibitively high. These findings are in good agreement with experimental data on the thermodynamic properties of the Na x O 2 species and provide a kinetic explanation for why NaO 2 is the main discharge product in Na–O 2 batteries under normal operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mekonnen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: