Key result
Urgent MVR and thrombectomy successfully resolves shock from severe mitral stenosis with mobile thrombus.
Why the study?
Severe mitral stenosis complicated by a large left atrial mobile thrombus poses a significant risk of hemodynamic collapse.
Case Report (n=1)
Urgent mitral valve replacement and thrombectomy is a life-saving measure for patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis complicated by an obstructing left atrial mobile thrombus leading to hemodynamic collapse.
May guide emergency decisions in rare mitral stenosis thrombus cases; leaves open optimal strategies without comparative data.
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) thrombus occurs in 17% of patients with severe mitral stenosis (MS), and the incidence doubles if it is accompanied by atrial fibrillation. Severe MS and large LA mobile thrombus (LAMT) pose a significant risk of hemodynamic collapse. CASE SUMMARY: A 55-year-old woman with LAMT obstructing the left ventricular inflow tract in severe MS presented with hemodynamic deterioration. Urgent mitral valve replacement (MVR) and thrombectomy were performed. The patient was discharged on day 39. DISCUSSION: Urgent MVR and LA thrombectomy are essential in ball-valve obstruction by thrombus. In this case, prompt referral and performing an emergent surgical approach led to a favorable postoperative outcome. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: A large LAMT in severe MS is a life-threatening condition when the thrombus obstructs the stenotic mitral valve. Prompt referral and performing urgent surgical MVR and thrombectomy could be a life-saving measure in this clinical condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putri et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Severe rheumatic mitral stenosis with left atrial mobile thrombus (n=1). Urgent mitral valve replacement and thrombectomy was evaluated. Urgent surgical mitral valve replacement and thrombectomy successfully resolved life-threatening hemodynamic collapse in a patient with severe mitral stenosis and a left atrial mobile thrombus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: