Key result
Retrospective reassessment of 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy revealed that 12% (15 cases) exhibited more than one morphological feature, most commonly central nucleus with cores.
Why the study?
Does retrospective reassessment of muscle biopsies in congenital myopathy identify overlapping histopathological features?
Observational (n=125)
No
Does retrospective reassessment of muscle biopsies in congenital myopathy identify overlapping histopathological features?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective reassessment of congenital myopathy biopsies reveals a 12% prevalence of overlapping morphological features, highlighting the diagnostic relevance of identifying these overlaps.
BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if any, during the initial diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical-stained slides from 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy were reassessed. RESULTS: The study revealed 15 cases (12%) of congenital myopathy with more than one morphological feature. Central nucleus with cores (n = 11), central nucleus, nemaline rods and cores (n = 3), and nemaline rods with cores (n = 1). 4/11 cases were diagnosed as centronuclear myopathy (CNM) in the first instance; in addition, cores were revealed on reassessment. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of CMs of all neuromuscular disorders is approximately 6 in 100,000 live births, with regional variations. Three main defined CMs include centro nuclear myopathy (CNM), nemaline rod myopathy (NRM), and central core disease (CCD). However, they are more diverse with overlapping clinical and histopathological features, thus broadening the spectra within each category of congenital myopathy. CONCLUSION: Identification of cases with overlap of pathological features has diagnostic relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhinakaran et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Congenital myopathies (n=125). Coexistence of multiple morphological features was evaluated on Proportion of cases with more than one morphological feature. Retrospective reassessment of 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy revealed that 12% (15 cases) exhibited more than one morphological feature, most commonly central nucleus with cores.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: