Key result
A baseline PR interval between 150 and 170 ms was associated with a significantly lower risk of death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; p=0.046) in CRT patients.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate how baseline PR interval is associated with outcomes and LV reverse remodeling in heart failure patients undergoing CRT.
Is a baseline PR interval of 150-170 ms associated with improved clinical outcomes and LV reverse remodeling in heart failure patients receiving CRT with fixed AV pacing delays?
Observational (n=1,718)
Is a baseline PR interval of 150-170 ms associated with improved clinical outcomes and LV reverse remodeling in heart failure patients receiving CRT with fixed AV pacing delays?
Hazard Ratio: 0.79 (95% CI 0.63–0.99)
p-value: p=0.046
In heart failure patients receiving CRT with fixed out-of-the-box AV delays, a baseline PR interval of 150-170 ms is associated with greater LV reverse remodeling and reduced risk of death or HF hospitalization.
Supports PR interval as a potential CRT response marker; leaves open whether PR-guided AV optimization improves outcomes in trials.
Background. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with prolonged QRS and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We aim to evaluate how the baseline PR interval is associated with outcomes (all-cause death or HF hospitalizations) and LV reverse remodeling (>15% relative reduction in LV end-systolic volume). Methods. Among 2224 patients with CRT defibrillators, 1718 (77.2%) had a device programmed at out-of-the-box settings (sensed AV delay: 100 ms and paced AV delay: 130 ms). Results. In this cohort of 1718 patients (78.7% men, mean age 66 years, 71.6% in NYHA class III/IV, LVEF = 27 ± 6%), echocardiographic assessment at 6-month follow-up showed that LV reverse remodeling was not constant as a function of the PR interval; in detail, it occurred in 56.4% of all patients but was more frequent (76.6%) in patients with a PR interval of 160 ms. In a median follow-up of 20 months, the endpoint of death or HF hospitalizations occurred in 304/1718 (17.7%) patients; in the multivariable regression analysis it was significantly less frequent when the PR interval was between 150 and 170 ms (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63−0.99, p = 0.046). The same PR range was associated with higher probability of CRT response (odds ratio = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.41−4.47, p = 0.002). Conclusions. In a large population of CRT patients, with fixed AV pacing delays, specific PR intervals are associated with significant benefits in terms of LV reverse remodeling and lower morbidity. These observational data suggest the importance of optimizing pacing programming as a function of the PR interval to maximize CRT response and patient outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gasparini et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure with prolonged QRS and impaired left ventricular systolic function (n=1,718). Baseline PR interval between 150 and 170 ms vs. Other PR intervals was evaluated on All-cause death or HF hospitalizations (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p=0.046). A baseline PR interval between 150 and 170 ms was associated with a significantly lower risk of death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; p=0.046) in CRT patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: