Key result
PR prolongation (>200 ms) was associated with an increased risk of heart transplantation, LVAD implantation, or death compared to PR ≤200 ms (adjusted HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.5).
Why the study?
PR interval prolongation is associated with poor outcomes after CRT in patients with LBBB, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.
Does PR prolongation predict time to heart transplantation, LVAD implantation, or death in CRT recipients with LBBB and EF ≤35%?
Cohort (n=291)
Does PR prolongation predict time to heart transplantation, LVAD implantation, or death in CRT recipients with LBBB and EF ≤35%?
Hazard Ratio: 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.5)
In patients with LBBB and EF ≤35% receiving CRT, baseline PR prolongation >200 ms predicts a higher risk of death, heart transplantation, or LVAD implantation, possibly due to inadequate ventricular resynchronization.
PR prolongation may identify higher-risk CRT recipients with LBBB; leaves open whether it should guide therapy selection.
BACKGROUND: PR interval prolongation is associated with poor outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) among patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) but the mechanisms are unknown. We investigated clinical outcomes, electrocardiogram (ECG), and echocardiogram changes after CRT by PR interval. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of CRT recipients with a baseline ejection fraction ≤35% and ECG showing sinus rhythm and LBBB. Patients were stratified by baseline PR interval quartile and the primary combined endpoint was time to heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, or death. ECG, echocardiogram, and clinical variables were compared to identify mechanisms for observed differences in outcomes. RESULTS: Of 291 eligible patients, the mean age was 65 years, 60% were male, and 19% had prior atrial fibrillation. Patients with PR prolongation (quartile 4, PR > 200 ms) more frequently had a history of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, prior implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and use of amiodarone than patients in PR quartiles 1-3. A PR > 200ms was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.1-2.5) for the primary endpoint. Patients with PR > 200 ms had less reduction in QRS duration and QRS area after CRT while having more increase in QT and QTc intervals than patients with PR ≤ 200 ms. No major differences were observed in echocardiography by baseline PR interval quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: PR prolongation predicts shorter survival free of heart transplantation or LVAD implantation in patients with LBBB. This may be due to inadequate ventricular resynchronization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atwater et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n=291). PR prolongation (PR > 200 ms) vs. PR ≤ 200 ms (quartiles 1-3) was evaluated on Time to heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, or death (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5). PR prolongation (>200 ms) was associated with an increased risk of heart transplantation, LVAD implantation, or death compared to PR ≤200 ms (adjusted HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: