Why the study?
The acute effects of different resistance training methods on heart rate variability, blood pressure, and rating of perceived exertion in patients with liver cirrhosis were unknown.
Does paired set resistance training compared to traditional set resistance training alter heart rate variability, blood pressure, and rating of perceived exertion in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Does paired set resistance training compared to traditional set resistance training alter heart rate variability, blood pressure, and rating of perceived exertion in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Both traditional and paired set resistance training elicit similar, safe acute cardiovascular responses in patients with Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both methods elicit similar safe acute responses in compensated cirrhosis; leaves open optimal long-term protocols.
Purpose: This study compared the acute effects of two different resistance training methods on heart rate variability, blood pressure, and rating of perceived exertion in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: Ten patients with Child-Pugh A (seven women and three men) participated in two experimental sessions, in random order: The traditional set condition consisted of three sets of six exercises performed in a sequential manner, while the paired set condition consisted of alternating sets between two exercises (three pairs of exercises). Ten repetitions were performed for each set with 70% of a 10 repetition maximum load and with 2 min rest between sets. Blood pressure and heart rate variability were assessed pre-workout and for 60 min post-workout. The rating of perceived exertion was assessed at the end of the third set for each exercise. Results: Significant alterations in heart rate variability were observed when considering the lowest value obtained during recovery, in which the SDNN was reduced in both the traditional set and paired set conditions, as well as the root mean square of standard deviation for the traditional set condition (p < .05). Additionally, for the paired set condition, there was a significant reduction in the HFnu band and a significant increase in the LFnu band (p < .05). Effect size showed reductions in diastolic and mean blood pressure until 30 min in a small magnitude for traditional sets. Conclusion: Similar cardiovascular responses were observed between methods eliciting normal physiological responses within safe limits for patients with liver cirrhosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasser et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: