Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of acute care management on outcome in children severely injured in road accidents. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective follow-up study conducted in 12 French pediatric intensive care units over a 24-month period. PATIENTS: Excluding those in refractory shock or in brain death at admission, a total of 125 children aged <17 years admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > or =16) were included. RESULTS: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and admission into a trauma resuscitation room (TRR) were used as proxy markers for the center management aggressiveness. Centers which admitted to TRR and monitored ICP when indicated in >75% of cases were called aggressive centers. Children with an ICP monitoring indication admitted to a TRR and monitored, as well as those without an indication treated in a TRR, were judged appropriately managed. A poor outcome at pediatric intensive care unit discharge was defined as a difference between the baseline and discharge pediatric overall performance category above 3, or a hospital death. Children with traumatic brain injury appropriately managed in a less-aggressive center were more likely to have a poor outcome than those appropriately managed in an aggressive center (odds ratio 7.56, 95% confidence interval 1.5-38.4), after adjustment for severity, age, and type of road user. CONCLUSIONS: The management in a more aggressive center for children admitted to TRR and monitored for ICP, when indicated, is associated with a better outcome. This could be explained by a more extensive experience in trauma management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javouhey et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: