This study investigates the performance of bit patterned media (BPM) in hard disk drives. It is revealed that written-in errors, rather than traditional signal-to-noise ratio, drive the recording performance of BPM. The staggered BPM structure allows for a larger write pole size, resulting in a larger write field. However, the lateral spacing between adjacent islands in staggered BPM is typically less than conventional BPM, leading to a higher written-in error rate. The investigation determines the effective switching field affected by the magneto-interaction field and finds that the write field is 21% higher in staggered BPM compared to conventional BPM. By analysing the error rate up to areal density of 5 Tb/in2, the study shows that conventional BPM achieves 1 Tb/in2 with the acceptable error rate, while staggered BPM can reach an areal density of 5 Tb/in2 with tight synchronous writing requirements. These insights are useful for designing the structure of BPM in hard disk drives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: