Why the study?
To investigate the feasibility of ERAS pathways in patients undergoing emergency repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Is the ERAS protocol feasible and safe in patients undergoing emergency repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease?
Is the ERAS protocol feasible and safe in patients undergoing emergency repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease?
The ERAS protocol appears safe and feasible for highly selected patients undergoing emergency repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ERAS may reduce stay and morbidity in selected emergency PPU repairs; leaves open efficacy and safety in broader groups pending RCTs.
Introduction: The surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease has evolved in parallel to advances in medical treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease. Objective: To investigate the feasibility of ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) Pathways in patients undergoing emergency repair for Perforated peptic ulcer disease. Materials and methods: Institutional based prospective analytical study. Indoor patients in Dept. of General Surgery in Medical College and Hospital Kolkata. January 2019 to June 2020. Study was conducted for 18 months.14 months was provided for data collection. Next 2 months for statistical analysis and another 2 months for thesis writing and submission. Conclusion: ERAS pathway (with some modications) seems to be safe and feasible in a highly selected subset of patients undergoing emergency Omental grahams patch repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rui et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: