This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Clinician use of diagnostic ultrasound, particularly at point of care and in emergency situations, is well established. The standard of training courses and of postcourse supervision and accreditation is variable, and international standards are required to maintain safety, accuracy, and credibility of the technique. The accuracy of the technique by trained personnel has been well documented. There is evidence that prereading, a course involving theoretical and practical training, and ongoing mentoring (proctoring) provides high standards of practice. Regular accreditation and continuous comparison with gold standards is required to maintain this level. Most areas of the body are now accessible to clinicians of varied specialties, even those previously thought impossible for ultrasound examination, such as the chest and bone. Training and supervision in rural, remote, and austere environments provides added challenges.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzanne Le P. Langlois (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: