Why the study?
Does general anaesthesia improve Apgar scores compared to epidural anaesthesia in preterm and term infants delivered by Caesarean section?
Does general anaesthesia improve Apgar scores compared to epidural anaesthesia in preterm and term infants delivered by Caesarean section?
General anaesthesia does not appear to improve Apgar scores or reduce fetal trauma compared to epidural anaesthesia during Caesarean section.
EDITORIAL COMMENT": We accepted this paper for publication because it carefully challenges a commonly expressed clinical opinion regarding the optimal anaesthesia for delivery at Caesarean section of the low birth‐weight infant. Our anaesthetist reviewer commented that the indication for Caesarean section was not considered and emphasized that Apgar scores have a poor correlation with fetal well‐being and should not therefore be considered as incontrovertible evidence for or consequence of poor operating conditions or birth trauma. A number of facts relating to general anaesthesic agents and their effects on the neonate are mentioned in the discussion. However, the extremely important concept of aortocaval compression and its effect on maternal cardiac output, peripheral resistance and the placental circulation was not. Summary: Retrospective comparison of epidural and general anaesthesia by a multivariate analysis of 1 and 5 minute Agar scores did not show that general anaesthesia improves operating conditions for Caesarean section or reduces fetal trauma for preterm and term infants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. Boyle (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: