Why the study?
Does real-time 3D echocardiography identify altered mitral annular geometry and motion in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation compared to normal controls?
Does real-time 3D echocardiography identify altered mitral annular geometry and motion in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation compared to normal controls?
Real-time 3D echocardiography demonstrates that patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation have delayed, reduced annular contraction and larger minimum annular area, which correlate with regurgitation severity.
Altered mitral annular dynamics in IMR are quantifiable by 3D echo; extends mechanistic understanding but leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: In patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), we assessed dynamic changes in mitral annular geometry and motion during the cardiac cycle, and examined their association with the severity of IMR, using our computerized three-dimensional (3D) echo method. METHODS: Real-time 3D echo was performed in 12 normal controls and 25 patients with IMR. The saddle-shaped annulus was reconstructed in every 3D volume/frame during a cardiac cycle. For each 3D volume/frame, we assessed the mitral annular area (MAA) and the annular contraction that was expressed as the percentage of the largest MAA accounted for by the change in MAA from largest to smallest calculated value. RESULTS: In IMR patients, the minimum MAA occurred in late-systole, while it occurred in early-systole in the controls. IMR patients had a larger minimum MAA (6.7 ± 1.3 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8 cm², P < 0.001) and reduced annular contraction (23.0 ± 6.5 vs. 42.6 ± 7.0%, P < 0.001) when compared to controls. Both minimum MAA and annular contraction had significant correlations with IMR severity (r = 0.67 and r = 0.78, P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: The contraction of the dilated mitral annulus occurred in late-systole in patients with IMR. The alterations of annular geometry and motion may be associated with the development of IMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daimon et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: