Why the study?
Does fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) compared to chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (CH-EVAR) improve outcomes in patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysm?
Does fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) compared to chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (CH-EVAR) improve outcomes in patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysm?
Both fenestrated and chimney endovascular aneurysm repair techniques demonstrate encouraging early and mid-term outcomes for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.
Both FEVAR and CH-EVAR effective for JAA; leaves open optimal selection pending randomized comparisons.
Juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JAA) account for approximately 15% of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (CH-EVAR) are both effective methods to treat JAAs, but the comparative effectiveness of these treatment modalities is unclear. We searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify English language articles published between January 2005 and September 2013 on management of JAA with fenestrated and chimney techniques to conduct a systematic review to compare outcomes of patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JAA) treated with the two techniques. We compared nine F-EVAR cohort studies including 542 JAA patients and 8 CH-EVAR cohorts with 158 JAA patients regarding techniques success rates, 30-day mortality, late mortality, endoleak events and secondary intervention rates. The results of this systematic review indicate that both fenestrated and chimney techniques are attractive options for JAAs treatment with encouraging early and mid-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: