Why the study?
Does trabectedin improve progression-free survival compared to dacarbazine in patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma previously treated with an anthracycline-containing regimen?
Does trabectedin improve progression-free survival compared to dacarbazine in patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma previously treated with an anthracycline-containing regimen?
Trabectedin significantly improves progression-free survival compared to dacarbazine in patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, leading to its FDA approval.
Supports trabectedin consideration post-anthracycline in advanced sarcomas; leaves open survival impact and sequencing.
On October 23, 2015, the FDA approved trabectedin, a new molecular entity for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma who received a prior anthracycline-containing regimen. Approval was based on results of a single, randomized, active-controlled, 518-patient, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion once every 3 weeks with dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 i.v. once every 3 weeks. Treatment with trabectedin resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), with a PFS of 4.2 months and 1.5 months for trabectedin and dacarbazine, respectively (HR, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–0.70; unstratified log-rank test, P < 0.001). The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral edema, dyspnea, and headache. Serious adverse reactions included anaphylaxis, neutropenic sepsis, rhabdomyolysis, hepatotoxicity, cardiomyopathy, and extravasation resulting in tissue necrosis. A postmarketing trial was required to evaluate the serious risk of cardiomyopathy. This approval provides another treatment option in a setting where no drug has been shown to improve overall survival. A key regulatory consideration during review of this application was the use of PFS as an endpoint to support regular approval of trabectedin. Clin Cancer Res; 23(24); 7448–53.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barone et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: