Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Development of growth and stand structure was studied in four spacing experiments with Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in northern Sweden. The sites were considered as poor for Norway spruce. Height and diameter growth were significantly lower in the densest spacings compared to the most widely spaced stands. In the dense spacings the relative growth rates of both small and large trees were reduced. Height‐diameter ratio was not influenced by spacing. Stand structure (Gini‐cooerficient and skewness) was not significantly affected by spacing. It was concluded that the major limiting factor for growth in the dense spacings was not light but mineral nutrients and/or water. The results also support the hypothesis of unchanged or decreased inequality when competition acts on all trees equally or in proportion to their size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1994 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: