Experimental study demonstrates efficient tetracycline photodegradation and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using a WO3/carbon nitride heterojunction, indicating dual environmental and energy...
In this study, graphitic carbon nitride (CN) and tungsten trioxide (WO 3 ) were successfully incorporated into bromine (Br)-doped graphitic carbon nitride (BCN) using an in-situ hydrothermal method . The photocatalytic efficiency of the resulting WO 3 /Br-doped CN (WBCN) composites for the removal of tetracycline (TC) antibiotics under sunlight irradiation was evaluated. The mass ratio of WO 3 to Br-doped CN (BCN) significantly influenced TC adsorption and photocatalytic degradation, with an optimal ratio of 9:1. The synthesized catalyst exhibited exceptional performance, achieving 98% TC detoxification under sunlight, attributed to enhanced light absorption , efficient charge separation, and reduced electron-hole (e − /h + ) recombination facilitated by BCN doping. Trapping experiments and ESR analysis identified • O 2 − and • OH as the primary reactive species in TC decomposition, with h + radicals playing a secondary role. Reusability tests further confirmed the high stability of the photocatalyst . The Z-scheme charge transfer mechanism was elucidated, highlighting the crucial role of Br doping in enhancing synergistic interactions between WO 3 and CN. Additionally, the nickel foam (NF) electrode supported by the WBCN-2 composite demonstrated remarkable electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution , achieving a minimum overpotential of 99 mV and a Tafel slope of 108 mV/dec at a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 . The WBCN-2@NF composite catalyst also achieved excellent performance, with a low cell voltage of 1.77 V at 10 mA/cm 2 . Chronopotentiometry (CP) tests revealed remarkable long-term stability, with minimal current loss over 15 h of continuous operation. Overall, the WBCN composite exhibits excellent photocatalytic and electrocatalytic performance, making it a promising candidate for practical environmental remediation and sustainable energy production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumaravel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: