OBJECTIVE: To determine whether undergoing training to become a lay leader and conducting an arthritis self-management course is associated with improvements in physical and psychological health status, arthritis self-efficacy, use of self-management techniques, and visits to the general practitioner. In addition, we aimed to describe the experiences of training and course delivery from the older volunteers' perspective. METHODS: 21 participants completed all assessments and had a median age of 58, median disease duration of 10 years, and either osteoarthritis (n = 13) or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 8). The study was a pretest-posttest design with qualitative data collected at 3 points in time: before training, 6 weeks after training, and 6 months after training. Quantitative data were collected through self-administered postal questionnaires at baseline and 6-month followup. RESULT: Six months after training, participants reported small, significant increases in arthritis self-efficacy for pain (P = 0.002), cognitive symptom management (P = 0.004), and communication with their physician (P = 0.024) and a small, significant decrease in depressed mood (P = 0.04). Qualitative data supported these findings, with participants reporting more confidence, happiness, and a changed outlook on life in general. Volunteerism was associated with altruistic behavior and with filling the vocational void caused by retirement. CONCLUSION: Findings support the value of volunteerism and training to become lay leaders in arthritis self-management programs. Volunteers reported positive changes both in themselves and in course participants. They enjoyed helping similar others and being involved in a worthwhile activity, and they valued their newly acquired status as lay leaders. Many had begun to apply their newfound knowledge about self-management to their own situation, reporting less pain and more willingness "to get on with life."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hainsworth et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: