Key result
Site-less patch-based ECG screening detects undiagnosed AF in ~2% of at-risk individuals.
Why the study?
Conventional screening modalities for AF are often constrained by considerable resource and logistical demands, leaving the effectiveness of a fully digital recruitment and patch-based screening strategy to be evaluated.
Does a fully digital, site-less patch-based ECG screening strategy detect previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in older adults at elevated stroke risk?
RCT (n=50,549)
1:1
Does a fully digital, site-less patch-based ECG screening strategy detect previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in older adults at elevated stroke risk?
Number Needed to Treat: 52
Number Needed to Treat: 52
A fully digital, site-less AF screening strategy is feasible and effective, identifying undiagnosed AF in 1.9% of an at-risk population with high subsequent adherence to anticoagulation.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The stand-out feature of the NORSCREEN study is that they were able to fully digitize and automate all recruitment stages of the study from identification of the potential cohort, confirming eligibility, signing consent, and data entry. Integral to this was their ability to use existing national digital infrastructure, specific to Norway. Nevertheless, NORSCREEN provides food for thought about what is possible, and where technology can take us in the future to enable a national scalable and affordable AF screening programme.”
Supports digital patch screening for AF in older adults at risk; extends evidence with randomized confirmation of scalable detection and high treatment uptake.
AIMS: Conventional screening modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) are often constrained by considerable resource and logistical demands. The randomized controlled NORwegian atrial fibrillation self-SCREENing (NORSCREEN) trial employs a fully digital approach to recruitment and implementation. The aim of this pre-specified analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of the fully digital recruitment and screening strategy, determine the prevalence of screen-detected AF, and assess initial adherence to therapeutic recommendations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individuals aged ≥65 years with ≥1 additional risk factor for stroke were digitally recruited from the general Norwegian population and randomized 1:1 to screening or usual care. Exclusion criteria included prior AF, anticoagulation, implantable cardiac electronic devices, or lack of smartphone access. Participants allocated to screening were mailed a patch-based electrocardiogram sensor for site-less continuous monitoring over 7 days. Those with diagnosed AF were advised to contact their general practitioner to initiate appropriate therapy. A total of 551 555 Norwegian residents were digitally invited; of these, 139 596 (25.3%) completed the digital eligibility assessment, 74 956 (53.7%) were eligible, and 50 549 (67.4%) were randomized to screening or usual care. The median age was 75 years (inter-quartile range: 69-78), 23 445 (46.4%) were female, and the mean CHA2DS2-VA risk score was 2.6 ± 0.9. In the screening group, 19 723 (78.1%) completed the study procedures. Previously undiagnosed AF was identified in 382 (1.9%) screened participants, of whom 366 (95.8%) initiated anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSION: The NORSCREEN trial demonstrates that fully digital, large-scale, site-less AF screening is feasible and effective in an at-risk population, identifying previously undiagnosed AF in 1.9% of screened individuals and showing high adherence to therapeutic recommendations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05914883.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boskovic et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Elevated stroke risk (n=50,549). Digital recruitment and patch-based ECG screening vs. Usual care was evaluated on Prevalence of previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (NNT 52). A fully digital, site-less screening strategy using a patch-based ECG sensor identified previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in 1.9% of screened individuals, with a number needed to screen of 52.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: