Why the study?
Although atrial fibrillation confers substantial cardiovascular and cognitive risk, the most suitable population and device for AF screening remain to be elucidated.
Does systematic atrial fibrillation screening enriched by a risk prediction model followed by 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring improve incident atrial fibrillation detection compared to standard care in individuals aged ≥65 years?
Does systematic atrial fibrillation screening enriched by a risk prediction model followed by 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring improve incident atrial fibrillation detection compared to standard care in individuals aged ≥65 years?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study protocol outlines a siteless, four-arm randomized trial evaluating whether combining an electronic health record-based risk prediction model with self-applied 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring increases the diagnostic yield of atrial fibrillation screening compared to standard care in older adults.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and confers an increased risk of mortality, stroke, heart failure and cognitive decline. There is growing interest in AF screening; however, the most suitable population and device for AF detection remains to be elucidated. Here, we present the design of the CONSIDERING-AF (deteCtiON and Stroke preventIon by moDEl scRreenING for Atrial Fibrillation) study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CONSIDERING-AF is a randomised, controlled, siteless, non-blinded diagnostic superiority trial with four parallel groups and a primary endpoint of identifying AF during a 6-month study period set in Region Halland, Sweden. In each group, 740 individuals aged≥65 years will be included. The primary objective is to compare the intervention of AF screening enrichment using a risk prediction model (RPM), followed by 14 days of a continuous ECG patch, with no intervention (standard care). Primary outcome is defined as the incident AF recorded in the Region Halland Information Database after 6 months as compared with standard care. Secondary endpoints include the difference in incident AF between groups enriched or not by the RPM, with and without an invitation to 14 days of continuous ECG recording, and the proportions of oral anticoagulation treatment in the four groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05838781.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Etminani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: