Why the study?
This supplement aims to share the management model of AF patients in the Local Health Unit Tuscany North-West and promote the importance of multidisciplinary management involving cardiologists and general practitioners.
A multidisciplinary management model involving cardiologists and general practitioners aims to improve clinical outcomes, therapeutic appropriateness, and economic sustainability for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Multidisciplinary AF care models remain hypothesis-generating; prospective RCTs needed before practice change.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent form of alteration in cardiac rhythm and is associated with a high economic burden resulting from both clinical consequences and impact on patients’ quality of life. Goals of treatment include symptom control and, in the high-risk patients, the prevention of thromboembolic complications. The advent of novel oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) has improved the management of patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) by overcoming limitations associated with traditional oral anticoagulation drugs. NOACs are associated with a lower risk of stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and with a lower risk of fatal, major, and intracranial bleeding. This supplement aims at sharing the virtuous management model of AF patients in the Local Health Unit Tuscany North-West and promoting the importance of a multidisciplinary management, which involves cardiologists and general practitioners (GPs), not only in terms of clinical outcomes, but also of therapeutic appropriateness and economic sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casolo et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: