Why the study?
Does mexiletine or other ER-targeting treatments restore the trafficking defects caused by Na(v)1.5 mutations in Brugada syndrome?
Does mexiletine or other ER-targeting treatments restore the trafficking defects caused by Na(v)1.5 mutations in Brugada syndrome?
Mexiletine and other ER-targeting drugs can partially restore surface expression defects caused by specific Na(v)1.5 mutations in Brugada syndrome, though the effect is mutation-specific.
Preclinical rescue remains mutation-specific and untested in humans; leaves open whether ER-targeting agents merit clinical trials in Brugada syndrome.
The human cardiac sodium channel Na(v)1.5 encoded by the SCN5A gene plays a critical role in cardiac excitability and the propagation of action potentials. Na(v)1.5 dysfunctions due to mutations cause cardiac diseases such as the LQT3 form of long QT syndrome, conduction disorders, and Brugada syndrome (BrS). They have also recently been associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. BrS is characterized by coved ST-segment elevation on surface ECGs and lethal ventricular arrhythmias in an apparently structurally normal heart. Na(v)1.5 mutations that cause BrS result in a loss of channel function. Our aim was to functionally characterize two novel Na(v)1.5 mutations (A124D and V1378M) in BrS patients. Wild-type (WT) and mutant Na(v)1.5 channels were expressed in tsA201 cells in the presence of the β(1)-auxiliary subunit. The patch-clamp technique and immunocytochemistry approaches were used to study the mutant channels and their cellular localization. The two mutant channels displayed a dramatic reduction in current density but had normal gating properties. The reduction in current density was caused by the retention of channel proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Mutant channel retention could be partially reversed by incubating transfected cells at 25°C and by treating them with mexiletine (for V1378M but not A124D), or with curcumin or thapsigargin, two drugs that target ER resident proteins. It is likely that the clinical phenotypes observed in these two BrS patients were related to a surface expression defect caused by ER retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreau et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: