System dynamics modeling reveals zero-deforestation palm oil policies curb local economic returns despite ecological gains, highlighting the need for compensatory financial mechanisms.
The growing demand for palm oil has driven oil palm plantation expansion and the associated environmental, economic and social impacts at the landscape level in the tropics. This research describes how a high-risk forested landscape in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, reacts to the deforestation-free palm oil trade policies implemented by the United Kingdom, the European Union and other countries using value chain and system dynamics methods. Our modelling shows that global green initiatives and palm oil certification have a detrimental relationship with local economic reduction but a beneficial relationship with environmental outcomes achieving zero deforestation. Although green deals impose costs, compensation methods such as carbon trading, ecological fiscal transfers, and payments for environmental services, exist. Premium prices for palm oil are critical to offset losses. These insights inform Indonesian deforestation reduction efforts and serve as benchmarks for agricultural commodities in differing contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Purnomo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: