Key result
A 50:50 dynamic and persistent crosslinker mixture enhances mesoscale heterogeneity and produces intermediate force responses.
Why the study?
Multiple actin crosslinkers coexist in cells, but how crosslinkers with distinct binding dynamics cooperate to regulate F-actin network structure and mechanics was unclear.
Cooperation between dynamic and persistent crosslinks in F-actin networks is deformation-regime dependent, tuning network architecture and mechanics without uniformly increasing rigidity.
Mixed crosslinkers tune actin network mechanics deformation-dependently; hypothesis-generating for cytoskeletal regulation in cardiomyocytes.
The coexistence of multiple actin crosslinking proteins in cells suggests that crosslinkers with distinct binding dynamics may cooperate to organize F-actin networks that support adhesion, motility, and division. Here, we examine how crosslinker identity and lifetime regulate actin-network structure and mechanics using a reconstituted system that combines α -actinin, a native dynamic actin crosslinker, with biotin–NeutrAvidin, a non-native model of long-lived, effectively persistent crosslinking. Using confocal fluorescence microscopy and optical-tweezers microrheology, we compared networks formed with α -actinin alone, biotin–NeutrAvidin alone, or a representative equimolar 50:50 mixture of the two crosslinking schemes at fixed total crosslinker-to-actin ratio, R . Mixed crosslinking produced the strongest mesoscale structural heterogeneity at high R , yielding larger characteristic structural features than either pure-crosslinker network. However, this structural coarsening did not translate into uniformly enhanced linear viscoelasticity: mixed networks generally exhibited moduli and viscosities intermediate between those of pure α -actinin and biotin–NeutrAvidin networks. Nonlinear microrheology further revealed that crosslinker identity and lifetime regulate force buildup, strain stiffening, and stress relaxation in an observable-dependent manner. Thus, the representative mixed-crosslinker network did not simply generate the strongest or most solid-like actin network. Instead, its effects were selective: it enhanced mesoscale heterogeneity at high R , produced intermediate linear and total nonlinear force responses, and gave rise to distinct nonlinear stiffening and relaxation behavior. These results demonstrate that cooperation between dynamic and persistent crosslinks is deformation-regime dependent, providing a mechanism for tuning actin-network architecture and mechanics without uniformly increasing rigidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godfrey et al. (2026) studied this question. Mixed crosslinking (α-actinin and biotin–NeutrAvidin) vs. Pure α-actinin or pure biotin–NeutrAvidin was evaluated on Mesoscale structural heterogeneity and mechanical response. A 50:50 mixture of dynamic α-actinin and persistent biotin-NeutrAvidin crosslinkers enhanced mesoscale heterogeneity at high concentrations and produced intermediate linear and nonlinear force responses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: