Key result
Composite CTI-AIP index is strongly linked to CAD severity, peaking at the 90th percentile.
Why the study?
Conventional mean regression methods result in a loss of detailed information regarding disease severity when assessing metabolic indices in coronary artery disease.
Cross-Sectional (n=2,885)
No
Triglyceride-glucose-derived indices and the atherogenic index of plasma, particularly the composite CTI-AIP, are significantly associated with the quantitative severity of newly diagnosed CAD and may serve as accessible biomarkers for assessing coronary plaque burden.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CTI-AIP was associated with CAD severity; hypothesis-generating for biomarker use, prospective validation required before clinical adoption.
Background Metabolic dysfunction, including insulin resistance, inflammation, and dyslipidaemia, plays a critical role in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI), and the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) are accessible biomarkers reflecting these disturbances. However, conventional methods of mean regression result in a loss of detailed information on disease severity. This study is aimed at evaluating the associations of the TyG index, CTI, and AIP with the quantitative severity of CAD across its entire distribution using quantile regression analysis. Methods This retrospective study included 2,885 patients with newly diagnosed CAD, as confirmed by coronary angiography. CAD severity was quantitatively assessed using the Gensini score. Metabolic indices, including the TyG index, CTI, and AIP, were calculated, and their composite indices—the TyG-AIP and CTI-AIP—were also derived. Correlation analysis and quantile regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between these indices and CAD severity across the distribution of the Gensini score. Results All the metabolic indices were positively but weakly linearly correlated with the Gensini score (all p < 0.001). The CTI demonstrated the strongest linear correlation with the Gensini score (partial r ≈ 0.29, adjusted for multiple covariates). Quantile regression analyses revealed significant heterogeneity in the associations between metabolic indices and CAD burden across the distribution of Gensini scores. All the metabolic indices were positively correlated with the Gensini score (all p < 0.001), with the CTI showing the strongest adjusted linear correlation. Quantile regression demonstrated progressively stronger associations across higher conditional quantiles, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Compared with the individual indices, the CTI-AIP and TyG-AIP showed stronger associations across most quantiles. Equality-of-slope testing confirmed significant heterogeneity across quantiles for all indices (all p < 0.01). Conclusion TyG-derived indices and AIP were significantly associated with Gensini scores. Quantile regression revealed marked heterogeneity in these associations, with CTI-AIP showing the strongest effect after multivariable adjustment in patients with moderate to high Gensini scores. Clinically, these indices may serve as potential biomarkers, with significant association across the distribution of coronary heart disease burden, especially in patients with newly diagnosed CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Newly diagnosed coronary artery disease (n=2,885). Triglyceride-glucose-derived indices and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) vs. Lower quantiles of metabolic indices was evaluated on Quantitative severity of coronary artery disease assessed by the Gensini score (β 30.561, 95% CI 24.271-36.851, p=<0.001). The composite CTI-AIP index was significantly associated with coronary artery disease severity, showing the strongest effect at the 90th percentile of the Gensini score (β 30.561).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: