Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case series demonstrates reduced pain and improved sexual function in women with vaginismus and pelvic floor hypertonia, suggesting therapeutic potential for radiofrequency energy.
Pelvic floor hypertonia is an important musculoskeletal contributor to chronic pelvic pain and may be associated with genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorders, including vaginismus.We describe a prospective case series of three women aged 31, 32, and 45 years with pelvic floor hypertonia and vaginismus who underwent six weekly treatment sessions using a monopolar capacitive-resistive radiofrequency device (C200; Capenergy Medical, S.L., Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain).Each session consisted of a 20-minute intracavitary application using the MJS (Medical Jet System) handpiece combined with simultaneous application of an automatic pelvic plate.Outcomes were assessed before treatment and at follow-up using pain scores, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), pelvic floor examination, and functional assessment of vaginal penetration.Baseline pain scores ranged from 8 to 9 out of 10 and decreased to 0 to 1 at follow-up.FSFI total scores increased from a baseline range of 8.3-12.4 to 28.9-31.8 at follow-up.All three patients showed improvement in clinically assessed pelvic floor muscle hypertonia and regained pain-free vaginal penetration, with satisfactory penetrative intercourse reported during follow-up.In this small uncontrolled case series, monopolar capacitive-resistive radiofrequency treatment was associated with clinically relevant improvements in pelvic pain, pelvic floor examination findings, and sexual function.These findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating and cannot establish treatment efficacy.Larger controlled prospective studies using standardized treatment protocols, objective pelvic floor assessments, and predefined long-term follow-up are needed to determine the efficacy, safety, and appropriate clinical role of this intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Isaza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: