Pilot study demonstrates positive outcomes for pelvic floor dysfunction therapy in women, indicating the effectiveness of energy-based treatment protocols.
Background and Objectives: Pelvic floor disorders are highly prevalent among women globally and can severely compromise daily functioning and well-being. Emerging energy-based modalities have reshaped conservative management strategies, by allowing individualized therapeutic approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of customized energy-based applications, via an innovative multimodal EVA/DAFNE device that incorporates multimodal energy-based synergistic technologies for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Materials and Methods: Patients with PFDs (pelvic organ prolapse, all types of urinary incontinence, bladder voiding dysfunction, and dyspareunia) who selected conservative treatments were prospectively enrolled. Baseline and after-treatment quality of life was assessed using the following validated tools: Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6), Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6), Marinoff Scale, 0-100 VAS, and Vaginal Health Index. Overall improvement was measured through the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Three to five sessions of treatment tailored according to the patient’s symptoms and clinical findings were delivered. Data were analyzed using standard statistical methods. Results: Twenty-six women with PFD who desired energy-based conservative treatment were recruited. Mean age was 48.6 ± 16.7 years. Indications for treatment were dyspareunia (n = 10; 38.5%), stress urinary incontinence (n = 9; 34.6%), mild pelvic organ prolapse (n = 6; 23.1%), genitourinary syndrome of menopause (n = 5; 19.2%), voiding dysfunction (n = 4; 15.4%), and overactive bladder syndrome (n = 2; 7.7%). Mean number of treatments was four. Baseline and after-treatment quality-of-life scores differed significantly. According to PGI-I scores 88.5% of patients considered themselves improved. Conclusions: Our study provides pilot estimates as to the safety and efficacy of a multimodal integrated treatment protocol for the treatment of PFD. Integrating multimodal energy-based conservative therapy into tailored treatment protocols can prove efficient and useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baruch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: