Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reveals low-level viremia doubles risk of treatment failure in HIV-treated individuals, highlighting the need for enhanced viral monitoring.
The impact of low-level viremia (LLV) on virologic outcomes and drug resistance in Guangxi, a high-burden region of southwest China, remains poorly characterized. Using the Guangxi HIV/AIDS surveillance database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 102,855 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-treated individuals aged ≥ 15 years. The association between LLV and subsequent virologic non-suppression and virologic failure was assessed longitudinally; drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were characterized cross-sectionally in a subset of 776 LLV cases (viral load 200–999 copies/mL) with successful genotyping. Data from Guangxi’s HIV surveillance system revealed that 10.68% of patients had LLV at baseline (51–199: 7.60%; 200–399: 1.61%; 400–999: 1.47%), with 7.61% exhibiting virologic non-suppression (≥ 1000 copies/mL). Among LLV cases, 23.31% progressed to non-suppression and 17.23% to virologic failure (≥ 2 consecutive viral load ≥ 1000 copies/mL) during follow-up VL monitoring at approximately 24-week intervals. LLV significantly increased the likelihood of non-suppression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.91, 95% CI: 1.80–2.04) and failure (aOR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.79–2.29) compared to virologically suppressed individuals. Genotypic analysis of 776 LLV cases identified DRMs in 41.24%, predominantly M184I/V (24.87%) and K103S/N (21.13%), with higher resistance in the 800–999 copies/mL range (aOR 3.36). These findings underscore the importance of intensified viral load monitoring and resistance profiling for patients with LLV to enhance ART efficacy in Guangxi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: