Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual framework evaluation demonstrates risk-based prioritization of critical administration attributes across enteral feeding tube scenarios, suggesting improved drug delivery safety.
Background/Objectives: The administration of medicines via enteral feeding tubes presents unique challenges, including dose loss, tube blockage, and user-dependent variability. Although Quality by Design (QbD) frameworks provide a structured approach to product quality, administration-related quality attributes are rarely assessed in a systematic manner during pharmaceutical development. A conceptual framework, termed the Quality Target Administration Profile (QTAP), was developed to extend QbD principles to the administration stage. Methods: The framework comprises three phases: administration context characterization, administration attribute identification, and risk-based determination of Critical Administration Attributes (CAAs). QTAP was applied to three representative EFT administration scenarios: a ready-to-use oral suspension, a crushed tablet, and an oral solution. Results: Application of the framework identified 18–32 administration attributes across the three representative scenarios and prioritized 5–6 CAAs per scenario according to clinical impact, variability risk, and human-factor considerations. Administration quality requirements varied across scenarios, reflecting differences in administration context, including dosage form, patient population, clinical setting, and user characteristics. QTAP provides a structured approach for identifying and prioritizing administration-related quality considerations within pharmaceutical development. Conclusions: As a conceptual framework, QTAP is intended to complement rather than replace existing QbD approaches. Future prospective validation, including human-factor studies and real-world evaluations, is needed to establish its practical utility and predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salunke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: