Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods study demonstrates that cultural exchange and heritage visits improve intergroup perceptions in conflict-affected communities, highlighting the efficacy of localized peacebuilding.
While the local turn in peacebuilding emphasises locally-informed interventions, translating this rhetoric into meaningful practice remains a significant challenge. Cultural and heritage-based approaches offer potential for bottom-up peacebuilding but are critiqued for being inadequately evidenced and insensitive to the culture-conflict-power nexus. This article addresses these gaps through a mixed-methods study in the Nineveh Plains, Iraq, utilising 262 interviews, and implementation of three culture-based initiatives. The research provides three core findings. First, there is significant local demand for culture-based approaches, with communities identifying cultural activities as viable pathways toward long-term peacebuilding. Second, the article provides strong exploratory evidence that initiatives centred on cultural exchange and heritage site visits improve intergroup perceptions and communication while fostering sustainable cross-communal relationships and contestation of entrenched misconceptions. Finally, programmatic success is fundamentally rooted in a substantial preparatory phase dedicated to in-depth local needs analysis and a prioritisation of small-scale engagement that emphasises depth of interaction over breadth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Driscoll et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: