Key result
Magene heart rate monitor shows no difference in accuracy compared to Polar H7.
Why the study?
The accuracy and reliability of the Magene heart rate monitor compared to the validated Polar H7 device needed evaluation during rest, maximal exercise, and active recovery.
Does the Magene heart rate monitor provide accurate and reliable heart rate measurements compared to the Polar H7 in healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=68)
Random order
Does the Magene heart rate monitor provide accurate and reliable heart rate measurements compared to the Polar H7 in healthy adults?
The Magene heart rate monitor shows acceptable agreement with the validated Polar H7 during exercise but may lack precision for resting heart rate monitoring in clinical settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Magene for exercise HR monitoring in healthy adults; leaves open precision for resting clinical use.
To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Magene ® heart rate (HR) monitor compared to the Polar ® H7 (validated device) during rest, maximal graded exercise test, and active recovery. A within-group study was conducted with 68 healthy adults (21 women). Participants completed two laboratory sessions using both monitors in random order. HR values were collected at rest, during the Ellestad maximal treadmill stress testing protocol, and in active recovery. Relative reliability was assessed using the two-way random effects intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement (ICC(2,1)). Absolute reliability was assessed using typical error (TE, in bpm and %), coefficient of variation (CV, %), and minimal detectable change (MDC, in bpm and %). Agreement was examined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Bland–Altman plots, and Pearson’s r or Spearman’s rho, as appropriate. No significant HR differences were found between devices ( p > 0.05). Mean biases, calculated as Polar – Magene, were 1.421 bpm at rest, 0.659 bpm during exercise, 0.103 bpm at maximal effort, and 0.569 bpm during active recovery. ICC(2,1) values ranged from 0.656 (rest) to 0.881 (maximal effort). TE ranged from 3.784 bpm (2.0%) to 6.470 bpm (8.7%), and MDC from 10.5 bpm (5.6%) to 17.9 bpm (24.2%), depending on the condition. Correlations ranged from 0.682 to 0.881. The Magene ® shows acceptable agreement with Polar ® H7 during exercise but may lack precision for resting HR monitoring in clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigues et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults (n=68). Magene heart rate monitor vs. Polar H7 heart rate monitor was evaluated on Heart rate differences between devices (Mean bias 1.421 bpm at rest, 0.659 bpm during exercise, 0.103 bpm at maximal effort, p=>0.05). The Magene heart rate monitor showed no significant differences compared to the Polar H7, with mean biases ranging from 0.103 bpm at maximal effort to 1.421 bpm at rest.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: