Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates a four-pillar metaphysical geometry for tension-defined systems across disciplines, indicating a path toward cross-domain coherence.
We present a generalized metaphysical framework grounded in the 2D Heuristic of the Intelligible. The framework is a portable lens for under- standing any system defined by tension—from cosmology to consciousness, from AI to ethics, from trauma to art. It is built on four pillars: the Logic of Identity, the 2D Heuristic, the Category Error Detector (CED), and the Homeostatic Principle. It is self-referential, open, and generative. It does not claim to describe reality as it is—it offers a geometry for engaging with reality as it appears. The framework includes a tensorial constraint on the Lagrangian, ensuring coherence across all modes of knowledge. It is offered as an open invitation to test, refine, and extend
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theriault et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: