Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates the value of multisensory methodologies in green criminology, highlighting how visual approaches reveal non-human suffering from environmental harm.
This note highlights the need to integrate multisensory methods into green criminology to better represent all victims of environmental harm—human, non-human, and ecological. Visual and sensory methods illuminate forms of suffering often overlooked by traditional, anthropocentric approaches, such as semi-structured interviews. While emphasizing the power of visual tools in researching harm to non-human animals, this note ultimately advocates for a broader turn toward sensory methods that can more completely access and communicate other-than-human experiences. Informed by, among others, critical animal studies, ethology, and biology, an integrated sensory and green criminological approach challenges anthropocentrism and repositions non-humans as research subjects rather than objects. Only through such inclusive multispecies methods can green criminology fully address environmental and species injustice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mònica Pons-Hernández (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: