Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical study demonstrates that a dual-responsive nanocomposite hydrogel enhances bone defect repair in osteoporotic mice, highlighting a microenvironment-targeted regenerative strategy.
The impaired regenerative capacity of osteoporotic individuals poses a significant challenge to the repair of bone defects. In the osteoporotic microenvironment, low pH, excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), and chronic inflammation create a self-perpetuating vicious cycle that impedes healing. However, conventional therapies fail to sustainably improve the damaged microenvironment. Here, a pH/ROS dual responsive nanocomposite hydrogel (Z-QCDs@M2-Migs@OHA-PP) was developed based on oxidized hyaluronic acid (OHA), phenylboronic acid-grafted ε-polylysine (PP), quercetin-derived carbon dots (QCDs) loaded ZIF-8 (Z-QCDs) and M2 macrophage-derived migrasomes (M2-Migs), which possesses intrinsic antioxidant and osteogenic differentiation-promoting capabilities. Due to the presence of dynamic. Schiff base bonds and boronate bonds, the hydrogel exhibited injectability and pH/ROS dual responsiveness. OHA-PP releases Z-QCDs and M2-Migs on demand in response to changes in pH and ROS levels. Z-QCDs exhibit strong antioxidant and nanozyme activity, capable of scavenging ROS, suppressing inflammatory responses, and promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Furthermore, the introduction of M2-Migs as an osteogenic activator further enhances the capacity for osteogenic differentiation. Transcriptomic and Western blot analyses revealed that the hydrogel promotes osteogenic differentiation by activating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. In a mouse osteoporotic bone defect model, the nanocomposite hydrogel effectively inhibited ferroptosis, modulated inflammation, and promoted new bone formation. Therefore, this hydrogel system, which combines therapeutic rationale with microenvironmental regulation, offers a promising strategy for the regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: