Why the study?
Does familial combined hyperlipidemia alter postprandial changes of apoB-100 and apoB-48 in TG rich lipoproteins following an oral fat load compared to matched controls?
Does familial combined hyperlipidemia alter postprandial changes of apoB-100 and apoB-48 in TG rich lipoproteins following an oral fat load compared to matched controls?
FCHL is associated with delayed clearance of large postprandial apoB-48 and apoB-100 TRL, leading to a higher atherogenic burden.
FCHL was associated with delayed postprandial TRL clearance; leaves open whether apoB monitoring improves risk stratification.
Impaired chylomicron (chylo) remnant clearance and small VLDL overproduction are major metabolic abnormalities in familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). Quantitative data on postprandial apolipoprotein B-48 (apoB-48) and apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) in TG rich lipoproteins (TRL) in FCHL have not been reported before. Eight untreated FCHL patients and 10 matched controls underwent a 24 h oral fat load. Fasting apoB-48 and apoB-100 were significantly higher in all TRL in FCHL. Maximal concentrations of chylo-[Svedberg's flotation rate (Sf) >400] apoB-48 and apoB-100 were reached later in FCHL (at t = 6 h), in contrast to controls (t = 4 h). Maximal VLDL1-(Sf60-400)-apoB-48 occurred at the same time point (t = 2 h) in both, whereas VLDL1-apoB-100 was maximal at t = 4 h in both, most likely representing delayed VLDL clearance by preferential clearance of chylo and their remnants by competition for the same clearance mechanisms. VLDL2-(Sf20-60)-apoB-48 and VLDL2- apoB-100 decreased in FCHL, in contrast to an increase of apoB-48, and no change of apoB-100 in controls, suggesting impaired conversion of VLDL1-apoB-48 into VLDL2-apoB-48 in FCHL, and partly also of VLDL1-apoB-100. In conclusion, in FCHL clearance of large postprandial Sf >400 apoB-48 and apoB-100 TRL is delayed. ApoB-100 accumulates in the VLDL1 range postprandially in both FCHL and controls, reaching higher levels in FCHL and thereby conferring a higher atherogenic burden in the postprandial situation in FCHL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verseyden et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: