Key result
Combining the edge-to-edge technique with annuloplasty significantly reduced the 10-year recurrence of MR ≥3+ compared to isolated annuloplasty (10.3% vs 30.8%, P=0.01), without improving survival.
Why the study?
Does the edge-to-edge technique combined with annuloplasty reduce MR recurrence and improve survival compared to isolated annuloplasty in patients with severe LV dysfunction and secondary MR?
Population
105 consecutive patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and secondary mitral regurgitation…
Comparison
Edge-to-edge technique combined with annuloplasty. vs Isolated undersized annuloplasty.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 7.2 years (interquartile range 4.3;10.4)
Authors
Loading...
May reduce MR recurrence in secondary MR; leaves open survival benefit and need for RCTs in severe LV dysfunction.
Cohort (n=105)
No
Does the edge-to-edge technique combined with annuloplasty reduce MR recurrence and improve survival compared to isolated annuloplasty in patients with severe LV dysfunction and secondary MR?
Hazard Ratio: 4.84 (95% CI 1.46–16.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.3% vs 30.8%
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with end-stage DCM and secondary MR, combining the edge-to-edge technique with undersized annuloplasty significantly decreases long-term MR recurrence compared to annuloplasty alone, though this does not translate into improved long-term survival.
Bonis et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Severe left ventricular dysfunction and secondary mitral regurgitation (n=105). Edge-to-edge technique combined with annuloplasty vs. Isolated undersized annuloplasty was evaluated on Recurrence of MR ≥3+ at 10 years (HR 4.84, 95% CI 1.46-16.1, p=0.01). Combining the edge-to-edge technique with annuloplasty significantly reduced the 10-year recurrence of MR ≥3+ compared to isolated annuloplasty (10.3% vs 30.8%, P=0.01), without improving survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: