Key result
Luseogliflozin significantly reduced estimated plasma volume by an adjusted mean difference of -8.73% compared to voglibose at 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Why the study?
SGLT2 inhibitors have diuretic effects via glycosuria and natriuresis, but their effect on estimated plasma volume in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF required assessment.
Does luseogliflozin reduce estimated plasma volume compared to voglibose in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF?
RCT (n=165)
Open-label
Randomized
Yes
Does luseogliflozin reduce estimated plasma volume compared to voglibose in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Luseogliflozin significantly reduces estimated plasma volume compared to voglibose in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF, suggesting intravascular volume reduction as a mechanism for clinical benefit.
AIMS: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors have diuretic effects in both patients with glycosuria and with natriuresis. We sought to assess the effect of luseogliflozin on estimated plasma volume (ePV) in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the MUSCAT-HF trial (UMIN000018395), a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial that assessed the effect of 12 weeks of luseogliflozin (2.5 mg, once daily, n = 83) as compared with voglibose (0.2 mg, three times daily, n = 82) on the reduction in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF. The analysis compared the change in ePV calculated by the Straus formula from baseline to Weeks 4, 12, and 24, using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. We also estimated the association between changes in ePV and changes in other clinical parameters, including BNP levels. Luseogliflozin significantly reduced ePV as compared to voglibose at Week 4 {adjusted mean group-difference -6.43% [95% confidence interval (CI): -9.11 to -3.74]}, at Week 12 [-8.73% (95%CI: -11.40 to -6.05)], and at Week 24 [-11.02% (95%CI: -13.71 to -8.33)]. The effect of luseogliflozin on these parameters was mostly consistent across various patient clinical characteristics. The change in ePV at Week 12 was significantly associated with log-transformed BNP (r = 0.197, P = 0.015) and left atrial volume index (r = 0.283, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Luseogliflozin significantly reduced ePV in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF, as compared with voglibose. The reduction of intravascular volume by luseogliflozin may provide clinical benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakashima et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=165). Luseogliflozin vs. Voglibose (0.2 mg, three times daily) was evaluated on Percentage change in estimated plasma volume (ePV) from baseline to 12 weeks (adjusted mean group-difference -8.73%, 95% CI -11.40 to -6.05). Luseogliflozin significantly reduced estimated plasma volume by an adjusted mean difference of -8.73% compared to voglibose at 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: