Key result
The OSTRC Overuse Injury Questionnaire identified 183 overuse conditions compared to only 28 identified by standard time-loss methods over a 24-week season.
Why the study?
Does the OSTRC Overuse Injury Questionnaire improve the detection of overuse injuries compared to standard time-loss methods in professional men's basketball players?
Population
13 athletes from a men's professional basketball team
Comparison
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse… vs Standard time-loss injury registration methods…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
24 weeks
Authors
Loading...
May improve overuse injury surveillance in basketball; leaves open impact on management or outcomes.
Observational (n=13)
No
Does the OSTRC Overuse Injury Questionnaire improve the detection of overuse injuries compared to standard time-loss methods in professional men's basketball players?
The OSTRC overuse injury questionnaire captures significantly more overuse injuries in professional basketball players than standard time-loss methods, highlighting a high prevalence of lower back injuries.
Weiss et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Overuse injuries (n=13). OSTRC Overuse Injury Questionnaire vs. Standard time-loss injury registration methods was evaluated on Number of overuse conditions identified. The OSTRC Overuse Injury Questionnaire identified 183 overuse conditions compared to only 28 identified by standard time-loss methods over a 24-week season.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: