Key result
EV-D68 subclade A2 was found to have a distinctly bimodal age distribution and was significantly more prevalent among older adults compared to subclade B3, alongside evidence of rapid antigenic evolution.
Why the study?
Worldwide outbreaks of enterovirus D68 in 2014 and 2016 caused serious respiratory and neurological disease.
Observational (n=2,758)
Yes
p-value: p=<0.001
EV-D68 exhibits rapid evolution of surface proteins, extensive diversity, and high rates of geographic mixing, with the A2 subclade disproportionately affecting older adults.
A2 subclade age skew suggests adult-focused surveillance; leaves open whether subclade-specific traits drive demographic patterns in evolving EV-D68.
Background Worldwide outbreaks of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) in 2014 and 2016 have caused serious respiratory and neurological disease. Methods We collected samples from several European countries during the 2018 out-break and determined 53 near full-length genome (‘whole genome’) sequences. These sequences were combined with 718 whole genome and 1,987 VP1-gene publicly available sequences. Findings In 2018, circulating strains clustered into multiple subgroups in the B3 and A2 subclades, with different phylogenetic origins. Clusters in subclade B3 emerged from strains circulating primarily in the US and Europe in 2016, though some had deeper roots linking to Asian strains, while clusters in A2 traced back to strains detected in East Asia in 2015-2016. In 2018, all sequences from the USA formed a distinct subgroup, containing only three non-US samples. Alongside the varied origins of seasonal strains, we found that diversification of these variants begins up to 18 months prior to the first diagnostic detection during a EV-D68 season. EV-D68 displays strong signs of continuous antigenic evolution and all 2018 A2 strains had novel patterns in the putative neutralizing epitopes in the BC- and DE-loops. The pattern in the BC-loop of the USA B3 subgroup had not been detected on that continent before. Patients with EV-D68 in subclade A2 were significantly older than patients with a B3 subclade virus. In contrast to other subclades, the age distribution of A2 is distinctly bimodal and was found primarily among children and in the elderly. Interpretation We hypothesize that EV-D68’s rapid evolution of surface proteins, extensive diversity, and high rate of geographic mixing could be explained by substantial reinfection of adults. Funding University of Basel and Swedish Foundation for Research and Development in Medical Microbiology
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hodcroft et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infection (n=2,758). Enterovirus D68 subclade A2 vs. Enterovirus D68 subclade B3 was evaluated on Age of patients infected with subclade A2 compared to B3 (p=<0.001). EV-D68 subclade A2 was found to have a distinctly bimodal age distribution and was significantly more prevalent among older adults compared to subclade B3, alongside evidence of rapid antigenic evolution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: