Key result
Vagus nerve stimulation performed after systemic lipopolysaccharide administration did not attenuate pulmonary or systemic inflammation in mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing rats.
Why the study?
Does vagus nerve stimulation or vagotomy reduce systemic and pulmonary inflammation in a two-hit rat model of LPS administration and mechanical ventilation?
Does vagus nerve stimulation or vagotomy reduce systemic and pulmonary inflammation in a two-hit rat model of LPS administration and mechanical ventilation?
p-value: p=<0.05
Vagus nerve stimulation performed after systemic LPS administration does not attenuate pulmonary or systemic inflammation in a two-hit rat model involving mechanical ventilation, questioning its clinical applicability in this setting.
Vagus nerve stimulation does not attenuate inflammation in this rat model; leaves open any role in human sepsis or ARDS.
Pulmonary inflammation contributes to ventilator-induced lung injury. Sepsis-induced pulmonary inflammation (first hit) may be potentiated by mechanical ventilation (MV, second hit). Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve has been shown to attenuate inflammation in various animal models through the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. We determined the effects of vagotomy (VGX) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on systemic and pulmonary inflammation in a two-hit model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were i.v. administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and subsequently underwent VGX, VNS or a sham operation. 1 hour following LPS, MV with low (8 mL/kg) or moderate (15 mL/kg) tidal volumes was initiated, or animals were left breathing spontaneously (SP). After 4 hours of MV or SP, rats were sacrificed. Cytokine and blood gas analysis was performed. MV with 15, but not 8 mL/kg, potentiated the LPS-induced pulmonary pro-inflammatory cytokine response (TNF-α, IL-6, KC: p<0.05 compared to LPS-SP), but did not affect systemic inflammation or impair oxygenation. VGX enhanced the LPS-induced pulmonary, but not systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine response in spontaneously breathing, but not in MV animals (TNF-α, IL-6, KC: p<0.05 compared to SHAM), and resulted in decreased pO(2) (p<0.05 compared to sham-operated animals). VNS did not affect any of the studied parameters in both SP and MV animals. In conclusion, MV with moderate tidal volumes potentiates the pulmonary inflammatory response elicited by systemic LPS administration. No beneficial effects of vagus nerve stimulation performed following LPS administration were found. These results questions the clinical applicability of stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in systemically inflamed patients admitted to the ICU where MV is initiated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kox et al. (2012) studied Sepsis-induced pulmonary inflammation and ventilator-induced lung injury. Vagus nerve stimulation and vagotomy vs. Sham operation was evaluated on Pulmonary and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine response (TNF-a, IL-6, KC) (p=<0.05). Vagus nerve stimulation performed after systemic lipopolysaccharide administration did not attenuate pulmonary or systemic inflammation in mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: