If computer science had not developed--significantly-as a science in the ten years between Curriculum '68 In 1968 computer science was searching for but had not yet found much in the way of the principles and theoretical underpinnings which characterize a (mature) science. Ten years later, there is nothing laughable about calling computer science a science. This decade has seen major advances in the theory of computation and in the utility of theoretical results in practical settings. The rapid growth of the field of computational complexity has greatly increased our ability to analyze algorithms. And perhaps most significantly, we have finally started to make real progress in developing principles and theories for the design and verification of algorithms and programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ralston et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: