Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: The aim of this economic evaluation is to address the economic impact of a multidisciplinary renal patient education on the work maintenance of patients with chronic renal disease. METHOD: A total of 281 patients were recruited. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis considering direct medical costs and days in the work force was performed. In addition, a Cox proportional hazards survival analysis was performed to investigate the effect of receiving the intervention on early retirement due to work disability. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [95% CI] per day in the work force saved was 737.02 degrees euro [-3345.64; 3093.03] in the whole group, 73.74 degrees euro [-995.28; 1429.92] in patients with a mild limitation and -113.25 degrees euro [-3252.06; 1525.58] in patients with a moderate to severe limitation in kidney function. After adjusting for observed time period, serum creatinine and age, having received the intervention had an almost significant medium-term protective effect on early retirement (hazard ratio 0.314, 95% CI 0.10-1.03, p = 0.0557). CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of the multidisciplinary patient education highly depends on the level of limitation in kidney function and the intervention may be cost-effective in maintaining patients with mild limitation in kidney function in the work force.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabariego et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: