Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Musaffe Tuna 1, 2 , Christopher I. Amos 2, 3 and Gordon B. Mills 4, 5, 6 1 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 2 Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA 3 Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA 4 Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 5 Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, USA 6 Precision Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA Correspondence to: Musaffe Tuna, email: mtuna9@gmail.com Keywords: fusion genes; fusion transcripts; epithelial tumors; mechanisms; pathobiology Received: November 14, 2018 Accepted: February 22, 2019 Published: March 12, 2019 ABSTRACT Recurrent fusion transcripts, which are one of the characteristic hallmarks of cancer, arise either from chromosomal rearrangements or from transcriptional errors in splicing. DNA rearrangements include intrachromosomal or interchromosomal translocation, tandem duplication, deletion, inversion, or result from chromothripsis, which causes complex rearrangements. In addition, fusion proteins can be created through transcriptional read-through. Fusion genes can be transcribed to fusion transcripts and translated to chimeric proteins, with many having demonstrated transforming activities through multiple mechanisms in cells. Fusion proteins represent novel therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers of diagnosis, disease status, or progression. This review focuses on the mechanisms underlying the formation of oncogenic fusion genes and transcripts and their impact on the pathobiology of epithelial tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuna et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: