Key result
While observational data suggest CABG yields better outcomes than PCI in elderly patients with complex coronary disease, dedicated randomized trials are needed to establish the optimal standard of care.
Why the study?
Does coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduce mortality, acute coronary syndrome, repeat revascularisation and recurrent angina compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients aged 75 years with multivessel disease or left main coronary artery disease?
Does coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduce mortality, acute coronary syndrome, repeat revascularisation and recurrent angina compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients aged 75 years with multivessel disease or left main coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial highlights findings that CABG may offer superior clinical outcomes compared to PCI in elderly patients with complex coronary artery disease.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ono et al. (2020) conducted an editorial in Multivessel disease or left main coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated. While observational data suggest CABG yields better outcomes than PCI in elderly patients with complex coronary disease, dedicated randomized trials are needed to establish the optimal standard of care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: