Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Pirfenidone is an antifibrotic compound able to slow down disease progression in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with IPF in a real-life setting. Methods: This was a multi-center, retrospective, real-life, observational study for patients with IPF receiving pirfenidone. Results: We identified 92 patients with IPF receiving pirfenidone. Eighty patients (70 males, 10 females, mean age±SD: 68.1+7.5, mean%FVC±SD=74.9+17.2, mean%DLCo±SD=48.1+16.9) were included in the analysis. Skin-related (25%) and gastrointestinal (17.5%) adverse events were the most common and led to drug discontinuation in 22.5% of cases. The majority (87%) of patients experienced side-effects during the first 6 months of treatment. At 36 months, changes in %FVC and % DLCO were -9.25±16.34 and -9.26±15.26, respectively. Six, 12 and 24 months after treatment initiation (n=80, 60, and 26), 18, 15 and 5 patients (22.5, 25 and 19.2%) experienced significant (>10%) and 11, 3 and 3 (13.8, 5 and 11.5%) marginal (5 to 10%) %FVC improvement. Thirteen, 6 and 1 (16.2, 10 and 3.9%) experienced marginal (-5 to -10%) and 20, 21 and 8 (25, 35, and 30.8 %) significant decline (<-10%) in %FVCpred, at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment initiation, respectively. Median survival was 851 days and 41 patients died during the study period. Conclusion: Pirfenidone demonstrated an acceptable safety and therapeutic profile in patients with IPF on a longitudinal basis. Prospective observational registries are sorely needed to provide a real-world view of pirfenidone outcomes in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzouvelekis et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: