Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY Amebae differed greatly in their ability to prey on algae. Species of Chlamydomonas, Pandorina, Anabaena, Ourococcus, Ankistrodesmus, and Gloeocystis were utilized by 3 or all 4 of the test protozoa, while strains of Staurastrum and Chlorella would not support growth of the predators. Heating the cells of Chlorella sp. rendered them available to the 4 amebae and made Pandorina morum a better nutrient for some of the protozoa. Heating Chlamydomonas oblonga had no effect on its availability to Tetramituis rostratus and reduced its suitability as a food source for Amoeba discoides. The rate of protozoan feeding was also influenced by temperature, pH, and age of the algal prey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: