// Tara Williamson 1 , Ren-Yuan Bai 1 , Verena Staedtke 2 , David Huso 3 , Gregory J. Riggins 1, 4 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 2 Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 3 Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 4 Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Correspondence to: Gregory J. Riggins, email: griggin1@jhmi.edu Keywords: mebendazole, sulindac, FAP, APC, colon cancer Received: June 04, 2016 Accepted: August 22, 2016 Published: September 06, 2016 ABSTRACT Inheritance of a gene mutation leads to the initiation of 5 to 10% of most cancers, including colon cancer cases. We developed a chemoprevention strategy using a novel combination of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) sulindac plus the anthelminthic benzimidazole, mebendazole. This oral drug combination was effective in the Apc Min/+ mouse model of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). Treatment with 35 mg/kg daily mebendazole reduced the number of intestinal adenomas by 56% (P = 0.0002), 160 ppm sulindac by 74% (P < 0.0001), and the combination by 90% (P < 0.0001). The combination significantly reduced microadenomas, polyp number and size in both the small intestines and colon when compared to untreated controls or sulindac alone. Mebendazole as a single agent decreased COX2 expression, blood vessel formation, VEGFR2 phosphorylation, and worked synergistically with sulindac to reduce overexpression of MYC, BCL2, and various pro-inflammatory cytokines. Given the low toxicity of mebendazole, these preclinical findings support the consideration of clinical trials for high risk cancer patients using mebendazole either alone or in combination. The findings have implications for populations with moderate and above risk for developing cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williamson et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: