Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: Globally, less than 1% of people who could benefit from a cochlear implant have one and the problem is particularly acute in lower-income countries. Here we give a narrative review of the economic and logistic feasibility of cochlear implant programmes in lower-income countries and discuss future developments that would enable better healthcare. We review the incidence and aetiology of hearing loss in low- and middle-income countries, screening for hearing loss, implantation criteria, issues concerning imaging and surgery, and the professional expertise required. We also review the cost of cochlear implantation and ongoing costs.Findings: The cost effectiveness of cochlear implants in lower-income countries is more limited by the cost of the device than the cost of surgery, but there are also large ongoing costs that will deter many potential users.Conclusions: We conclude that the main barriers to the future uptake of cochlear implants are likely to be logistical rather than technical and cochlear implant provision should be considered as part of a wider programme to improve the health of those with hearing loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bodington et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: