Key result
In patients with Fontan circulation, respiration had a significantly greater effect on venous flow pulsatility than the heartbeat, with a respiratory-to-cardiac amplitude ratio of 2.83 compared to 0.40 in normal controls.
Why the study?
There is no consensus on whether heart beat or respiration is the main driving force of venous return in the Fontan circulation and which governs periodic flow pulsatility.
Is heart beat or respiration the main driving force of systemic venous return in patients with Fontan circulation compared to normal controls?
Observational (n=25)
Is heart beat or respiration the main driving force of systemic venous return in patients with Fontan circulation compared to normal controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.83% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Heart beat, rather than respiration, is the primary driving force of net systemic venous return in the Fontan circulation, providing insights into abnormal venous return patterns.
Respiration-driven pulsatility may promote retrograde IVC flow in Fontan patients; leaves open its contribution to hepatopathy and need for prospective validation.
The Fontan procedure provides relief from cyanosis in patients with univentricular hearts. A major clinical unmet need is to understand whether the venous flow patterns of the Fontan circulation lead to the development of congestive hepatopathy and other life-threatening complications. Currently, there is no consensus on whether heart beat or respiration is the main driving force of venous return and which one affects the periodic flow changes for the most (i. e., pulsatility). The present study, for the first time, quantified respiratory and cardiac components of the venous flow in the inferior vena cava (IVC) of 14 Fontan patients and 11 normal controls using a novel approach ("physio-matrix"). We found that in contrast to the normal controls, respiration in Fontan patients had a significant effect on venous flow pulsatility, and the ratio of respiration-dependent to the cardiac-dependent pulsatility was positively associated with the retrograde flow. Nevertheless, the main driving force of net IVC flow was the heart beat and not respiration. The separate analysis of the effects of respiration and heart beat provides new insights into the abnormal venous return patterns that may be responsible for adverse effects on liver and bowel of the patients with Fontan circulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabbert et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Fontan circulation (n=25). Fontan circulation vs. Normal circulation was evaluated on Respiratory-to-cardiac amplitude ratio (p=<0.001). In patients with Fontan circulation, respiration had a significantly greater effect on venous flow pulsatility than the heartbeat, with a respiratory-to-cardiac amplitude ratio of 2.83 compared to 0.40 in normal controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: